1 min read
Q1 2025 CEO Update: Making Complete Visibility the New Standard
As we wrap the first quarter of 2025, I’m excited to share a few reflections on our progress and what lies ahead. In just a few months, we’ve seen ...
Experiencing an active breach? Call us immediately at 1-866-405-9156 UncommonX has experienced ZERO reportable breaches.
4 min read
Ray Hicks
:
Apr 17, 2025 9:47:26 AM
In cybersecurity, we’re not fighting a single battle—we’re in a continuous arms race.
Every new tool the industry deploys to stop an emerging threat becomes the next target for attackers to bypass, disable, or exploit. The so-called “EDR Killer,” which made headlines earlier this month, is just the latest move in this cycle.
But the real story isn’t about EDR—it’s what it reveals: if our cybersecurity strategies don’t evolve alongside the threats, we’re always one step behind. It also offers a moment to reflect on how we think about cybersecurity—especially the difference between relying on a point solution and achieving complete visibility.
The EDR Killer refers to a set of attack methods or tools designed to disable or evade endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems. EDR applications are designed to identify and stop malicious activity at the endpoint. They are critical in modern security stacks—but not infallible.
What makes this type of attack so dangerous? It actually shuts down the very tools meant to detect it. By gaining elevated privileges, attackers can terminate the EDR agent, effectively silencing the alarm while continuing their activity undetected.
The techniques involved vary—from abusing Windows APIs, to using obfuscated shellcode, to injecting malicious processes into legitimate applications. Some attackers are even leveraging signed but vulnerable drivers to disable EDR from the kernel level.
While this exploit has raised concerns, it's important to note: it only affects a portion of the market—an estimated 30% of EDR products. The products affected typically rely on predictable architecture or lack additional safeguards like runtime obfuscation or privilege separation.
The EDR Killer isn’t a fluke. It’s part of a pattern we’ve seen before, and we’ll see again. The industry innovates to address a new threat vector. Then attackers adapt. We react. The cycle continues.
Think back to how phishing evolved. Initially, the industry responded to external threats by locking down network perimeters. That worked—until attackers realized they could get in through people. Spoofing internal emails bypassed external filters. So security shifted to inspect internal traffic, route origination, and behavioral anomalies.
This is what we mean when we say cybersecurity is an arms race. Every defense leads to a new offense, and vice versa.
At a high level, endpoint protection software runs on your device with certain privileges, and it uses cryptographic signatures or protected memory spaces to prevent tampering. But if an attacker gains sufficient privileges—through phishing, privilege escalation, or vulnerability exploitation—they can effectively “nuke” the EDR process.
In some cases, attackers know exactly where on the system the EDR agent lives. If the software architecture is too static or predictable, it's easier to target and disable. In other cases, they exploit how the EDR interacts with system calls or intercepts functions, removing those hooks or rendering the agent ineffective.
Some vendors anticipated this. They implemented runtime obfuscation, dynamic memory allocation, or hardened privilege structures. Others didn’t—because until now, it wasn’t a known issue. That’s changing fast.
If your organization uses one of the EDR tools potentially impacted, here are several actions you can take immediately to reduce risk:
One of the biggest lessons here — no single product is enough to protect your organization. Security must function as a system, not a set of disconnected tools. The faster you can correlate data from across your endpoints, networks, and users, the faster you can identify, isolate, and mitigate threats—before they spread.
At UncommonX, we built our Exposure Management platform around that belief. By unifying signals across your environment, we help you detect compound threats—those that don’t raise red flags in isolation but signal a real problem when viewed together. That’s what it means to be proactive, not reactive.
When an endpoint stops checking in, that’s a signal. When traffic to a known malicious IP begins, that’s another. When a user receives a suspicious email, yet another. Individually, they’re noise. Together, they’re the start of a breach.
At the heart of this is a concept we’ve championed from the beginning: Exposure Management. It’s not just about knowing what vulnerabilities exist—it's about understanding how exposed your environment is right now, based on real-time configurations, behaviors, and threat activity.
When attackers leapfrog your latest defense, Exposure Management is your safety net. It helps you:
It gives you the context you need to act decisively—before an issue becomes a full-blown incident.
The EDR Killer won’t be the last time an exploit challenges the tools we trust. But the organizations that thrive in this environment are the ones who don’t just buy security—they build resilience.
That starts with complete visibility. With context. With unifying your signals into one clear picture. And with a commitment to not just reacting when things go wrong, but preparing for when they inevitably will.
At UncommonX, that’s our mission—and our promise. If you’re ready to turn today’s risk into tomorrow’s advantage, we’re here to help. If you’d like more information about this topic, Contact us today.
1 min read
As we wrap the first quarter of 2025, I’m excited to share a few reflections on our progress and what lies ahead. In just a few months, we’ve seen ...
In cybersecurity, visibility is everything. Most organizations focus on defending their network perimeter—monitoring inbound and outbound traffic to...
For years, organizations treated network telemetry as an optional enhancement—useful, but not essential. Security teams focused on firewalls,...