3 min read

Rethinking Cybersecurity in Education for a Proactive Future

Rethinking Cybersecurity in Education for a Proactive Future

Cyberattacks on schools aren’t just a growing trend—they’re a persistent and evolving threat. 

As school districts continue working hard to protect their digital environments, it’s becoming clear that outdated defenses or traditional managed detection and response (MDR) services may not be enough on their own to keep pace with today’s challenges.

The newly released 2025 MS-ISAC K–12 Cybersecurity Assessment Report delivers a clear and urgent warning: K–12 schools are in the crosshairs of increasingly sophisticated cyber threat actors. With valuable data and limited resources, schools are especially vulnerable—and attackers know it.

A wake-up call for school districts

According to the MS-ISAC report:

  • 82% of districts experienced a cyber incident between mid-2023 and early 2024
  • Over 9,300 confirmed incidents were reported, including phishing, ransomware, and credential theft
  • Malvertising and stolen credentials were the most common entry points
  • Many schools still lack foundational protections like multi-factor authentication (MFA), network segmentation, or real-time monitoring
  • Cyberattacks disrupted daily operations—from instruction to nutrition services and access to student records

Despite increased awareness and new funding opportunities, most school systems still struggle to implement effective, sustainable security practices. This disconnect between tools and outcomes highlights a larger issue: schools need more than technology. They need a strategy.

The problem with “more tools”

In response to funding opportunities, many districts understandably focus on eligibility checklists and technology categories. But simply matching tools to grant requirements can backfire if there’s no strategic vision behind the purchase.

Here’s why more tools don’t automatically lead to better security:

  • Tools often don’t integrate well, creating silos or blind spots in visibility
  • Poor configuration leaves new systems just as vulnerable as before
  • Alert fatigue is a real issue—IT teams are overwhelmed with signals, few of which offer actionable guidance
  • Complexity increases while real-world protection stays stagnant

What’s missing isn’t effort—it’s clarity. Schools need to move from reacting to alerts to actively managing their exposure to risk.

A smarter way to secure K–12 environments

Enter Exposure Management: a strategic approach to cybersecurity that focuses on identifying, prioritizing, and addressing risk before it becomes an incident.

Unlike traditional MDR solutions, which rely heavily on alerts and tools, Exposure Management gives schools a roadmap to see what matters most, secure it efficiently, and continuously adapt as new risks emerge.

There are five foundational components of an effective Exposure Management approach:

  1. Priority
    Start by identifying your most critical systems—student information systems, testing platforms, payroll—and focus protections there first.
  2. Vulnerability
    Rather than reacting to every CVE from a vulnerability scan, focus on what’s actually exploitable in your environment.
  3. Profile
    Detect behavioral anomalies, such as unusual logins or access patterns, which may indicate compromised accounts or insider threats.
  4. Telemetry
    Use real-time monitoring to understand where human error or risky behaviors are occurring, so you can intervene early.
  5. Controls
    Ensure your core defenses—like MFA, EDR, and firewalls—are not just in place, but working as intended.

This isn’t about adding more. It’s about doing more with what you already have—backed by a strategic framework that drives real results.

Not all MDR is created equal

Many school districts look to MDR providers to help fill staffing and visibility gaps. But not every MDR solution is built the same.

Traditional MDR often centers around reactive alerting, limited tool support, and high costs for hands-on assistance. MDR powered by Exposure Management takes a fundamentally different approach—one that’s built for resource-constrained environments like K–12 education.

Here's how they compare:

Traditional MDR:

  • Focuses on alerting after threats have occurred

  • Tied to specific vendors or tools

  • Offers minimal prioritization of risks

  • Often requires additional payment for remediation help

  • Can lead to increased costs and complexity

MDR Powered by Exposure Management:

  • Identifies and addresses risks proactively

  • Works across your full stack, regardless of vendor

  • Delivers actionable, prioritized insights

  • Includes analyst access and remediation support

Schools don’t need an enterprise security team to make this model work. They just need the right visibility, guidance, and support to act confidently.

Why this works for schools

Exposure Management isn’t just a solution for large corporations. It’s tailor-made for K–12 environments, where small IT teams wear multiple hats and budgets are under constant pressure.

This model:

  • Provides immediate return on investment by identifying underused or redundant tools

  • Supports automation and expert guidance to reduce manual workload

  • Aligns with FCC cybersecurity funding, NCSR assessments, and new E-Rate pilot programs

  • Empowers districts to meet compliance requirements while actually improving security posture

At a time when every dollar matters, districts using this approach have reported cost savings of up to 30%—without compromising protection.

A smarter path to resilience

At UncommonX, we help school districts reduce complexity and strengthen their cybersecurity posture with MDR for Education powered by Exposure Management.

This isn’t just about monitoring and alerts. It’s about helping districts:

  • Gain full visibility into assets, behaviors, and vulnerabilities

  • Take focused action on the risks that truly matter

  • Streamline operations by consolidating and optimizing existing tools

The result? A more resilient digital environment, a less stressed IT team, and more funds available for your core mission: education.

Ready to take the next step?

If your school district is exploring new cybersecurity solutions or applying for funding, make sure you ask this key question: Is it powered by Exposure Management?

It could be the difference between putting out fires and building a truly secure foundation for the future. To learn more, visit www.uncommonx.com or reach out directly at hello@uncommonx.com

A Case for Exposure Management in Our Schools

A Case for Exposure Management in Our Schools

This week, I had the privilege of representing UncommonX at the TCEA Conference in Austin, Texas. TCEA is the largest nonprofit educational...

Read More
Strategies for Advancing Cyber Resilience in K-12 Schools

Strategies for Advancing Cyber Resilience in K-12 Schools

In early 2024 the Federal Communications Commision (FCC) advanced its proposalto launch a pilot program that would allocate $200 million for...

Read More
Mitigating Human Error in K-12 School Cybersecurity With Telemetry

1 min read

Mitigating Human Error in K-12 School Cybersecurity With Telemetry

Cybersecurity in schools is often framed as a technology challenge, but the most common point of failure isn’t a firewall misconfiguration or...

Read More